• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 64 65 66 67 68 … 780 Next »
Open Petition to the Admins: POBs

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (11): 1 2 3 4 5 … 11 Next »
Open Petition to the Admins: POBs
Offline Jack_Henderson
10-24-2016, 11:35 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-29-2016, 10:41 PM by Jack_Henderson.)
#1
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

If you support this petition, put your name into a post and state that you want to sign up.
I will edit it into the OP to include your name.

Thank you for your support.


Quote:Dear Admins,
This is an open petition signed by the following players asking you to remove all Player-owned bases from jumpholes, jumpgates and mining fields and to place them into locations that are in accordance with the rules (not closer than 15k).

We think that area denial bases and hole/gate blocking bases should not have a place in today's Disco any more.

This motion is the logical consequence of the public poll (http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=144389) in which more than 70 % agree that there should not be any bases closer than 15k from mining fields and the poll in the faction leader channel (http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=138247). In this one 19 out of 24 faction leaders (= 79 %) voted to "Remove all POBs from mining fields and their direct vicinity (also those that were grandfathered in)", (19 agreed, 3 disagreed, 2 neutral).

Signed by:

Jack_Henderson (IMG), Impyness (JM / BHG), Antonio (Aoi), TheSauron (GG), Shaggy (CR), Venkman (IC|), Auzari (Auxesia), Caconym (Gateway), Alex., Luka, Danny-boy, Zayne Carrick, Vendetta, Stygian, Ned, Thunderer, Petitioner, Freeport7, kindred, Lyth, Zelot, Laz, John Wildkins, Ghostazarashi, TheShooter36, Durandal, Zyliath, Sky, Operator, Corile, Sanctions, Reid, sasapinjic, Freeroamer, Wizard., ChillerMiller, Hunor, Garrett Jax, Tutashkhia, Mímir, Ace Razgriz, Arioch, SMI-Great.Fox, Aereon, Kopesh,

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Online Thunderer
10-24-2016, 11:39 PM,
#2
Tea Disposal Unit
Posts: 5,614
Threads: 466
Joined: Jul 2011

In support.

[Image: 396AUfe.png]
Bretonian Treaty Database Bretonian Armed Forces Recruitment Center
Bretonian Charter of Interstellar Law Bretonian Secrets Act
Reply  
Offline Petitioner
10-24-2016, 11:41 PM,
#3
a e s t h e t i c
Posts: 3,372
Threads: 294
Joined: Dec 2009

As a player with plenty of PoB experience, I would like to conditionally sign this by saying that, in my view, it doesn't make sense with the current set of PoB rules (namely mandatory attack declarations) to allow PoBs in these sensitive locations.

/signed

[Image: gamer5000.gif]

Recruitment | Task Force Prometheus | ICN FIRESTORM
  Reply  
Offline kindred
10-24-2016, 11:41 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 1,699
Threads: 9
Joined: Sep 2007

I am in almost full concurrence with this request, but instead of "removed" the bases should be "moved" to allow fair passage for all vessels.
Reply  
Offline Freeport7
10-24-2016, 11:54 PM,
#5
Member
Posts: 521
Threads: 19
Joined: Nov 2011

I agree with this petition. But I think that regarding PoB's this is one of the least concerning problems right now that need to be fixed/rethinked.

/signed nonetheless
Reply  
Offline Zelot
10-25-2016, 01:02 AM,
#6
Member
Posts: 7,539
Threads: 379
Joined: Jun 2007

Makes sense

/signed

[Image: 13121_s.gif]  
Reply  
Offline Wildkins
10-25-2016, 01:03 AM,
#7
Freeport 3
Posts: 1,943
Threads: 175
Joined: Feb 2013

[Image: 5b1117199bae2d03b4fc08a62e51cbbe.jpg]

/signed

RP Feedback
Reply  
Offline Alley
10-25-2016, 06:20 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

(10-24-2016, 11:35 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: We think that area denial bases and hole/gate blocking bases should not have a place in today's Disco any more.

I could get behind this if this petition also prevent POBs from being within 15k of any NPC base.
These are as harmful as mining field POBs.

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Reply  
Offline Mercarryn
10-25-2016, 07:05 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 980
Threads: 55
Joined: Jul 2011

(10-25-2016, 06:20 AM)Alley Wrote:
(10-24-2016, 11:35 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: We think that area denial bases and hole/gate blocking bases should not have a place in today's Disco any more.

I could get behind this if this petition also prevent POBs from being within 15k of any NPC base.
These are as harmful as mining field POBs.

Alley is right, Jack. Only going for one type of Area-denial-bases is one-sided and shows quite well your intention "behind the scenes" so to speak, namely
just trying to get rid of Reutlingen somehow while keeping the benefits from Aland denying pirates a nice piracy spot.
Go for all types of areal denial POBs or keep it as it is. Otherwise this petition is just poor form, because the siege recently failed.
Reply  
Offline Apollon
10-25-2016, 07:52 AM,
#10
Emperor's Wrath
Posts: 1,772
Threads: 101
Joined: May 2012

This should have happened a while ago.

/signed

[Image: Fiea82t.jpg?1]
Reply  
Pages (11): 1 2 3 4 5 … 11 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode