• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 468 469 470 471 472 … 547 Next »
Capital SML

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Capital SML
Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever
05-25-2008, 06:04 AM,
#11
Unregistered
 

Haha, well i really know the idea would be shot down rather quickly, but whatever. how big is the Heavy Mortars Blast Radius?
Reply  
Offline Linkus
05-25-2008, 02:53 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

Some more capital ship weapons would be nice though. Maybe some homing torpedos? Not as powerful as a Nova of course, but something else to have.





Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
  Reply  
Offline globalplayer-svk
05-25-2008, 03:11 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 1,527
Threads: 45
Joined: Sep 2007

2k? 1k ? can you imagine what happend for example with weapons on your cruiser when you are without shield and someone hit you ? ....

or what happend to some vanila cap ships ?

[Image: vladsignature.png]
  Reply  
Offline pim
05-25-2008, 10:03 PM,
#14
Member
Posts: 292
Threads: 6
Joined: Mar 2008

Your main idea was a kind of torpedo lancher for cap ? That's it ?!
I LOVE IT, but remeber something, torpedos can be fired at... That would be awesome ! : "I hope your escort is good enough to shoot THIS ! *schtonk* *torpedo.approaching*"
*BOAM !*
"OUCH ! Looks like no..."

OK for gentle RP, OK for gentle PvP too. What do you prefer ?
Hurk hurk hurk...

[\JG/]Pim (mercenary, ex-IMG)(Raven's talon, New London and New Berlin mainly)
John Smith(independant trader, ex-contract killer on Manhattan)(Heavy Tanker)
  Reply  
Offline Generation
05-25-2008, 11:35 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-25-2008, 11:36 PM by Generation.)
#15
Member
Posts: 443
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:I don't recall any specific cases of death being caused by a nuclear bomb falling onto a person, generally they're attributed to the explosion that happens after the fact.



I love that one.....


Any way Cap hater here.

Caps are <censored>

[Image: .gif][Image: .gif]

[Image: lwb_crawford.jpg]


[Image: userbar654969ky7.gif]
[Image: s3f3hs.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Nysquist
05-26-2008, 12:39 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 39
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2008

No blast radius based weapons in Freelancer, EVER!

Why?
The blastradius is insignificantly when there is no matter and no O2 to expand into (space is "made" of vaccum)? The only way a real nuke might work in space in accuall reallity is if your enemy had a hull breach and was leeking atmospheare, and that would allow a blast to enter the ship.

And there is no shockwave either, but the radiation is enough to kill an entire crew quite fast.

Then again, fire a "futuristic" nuke in an ice cloud and you'll have a radius of tens of km. Dense fluidic matter is exellent for a big nuke bang.

We still have to allow some small blasts in freelancer weaponry to give us some more intressting dogfights.
Reply  
Offline El Nino
05-31-2008, 01:12 PM,
#17
Member
Posts: 1,248
Threads: 25
Joined: Dec 2007

Hm, antimater weapons are way more efficient then nukes... why on earth would you bother with such old weapons...

Donate to the Poor Pilot's Fundation via Sirius Bank /givecash GreenHawk 1000000 now, and support poor pilots sirius wide!
Skype: jure.grbec
My primary char: Jose El Nino - Corsair Elder captain of the SS Greenhawk

Currently Inactive due to pursuit of life long dreams, will be back...*edited* As promised am back.

[Image: opgbar.gif][Image: rightbar.jpg]
[Image: Sungi_sig.png]
  Reply  
Offline Tic
05-31-2008, 01:47 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 1,211
Threads: 109
Joined: Nov 2007

Mwhahahaha, me wantz teh nuke!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8h9isoYiYTM

This is how SHIVA from FL CE looks. Mwhahahahaha!
  Reply  
Offline Tortured_Soul
05-31-2008, 04:44 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-31-2008, 04:48 PM by Tortured_Soul.)
#19
Member
Posts: 205
Threads: 14
Joined: May 2007

@ Thompson: Nuclear explosions are fission reactions which split the nuclei of the warhead into smaller nuclei, usually stopping somewhere in the region of lead, and it's isotopes, in the periodic table. They do not consume oxygen as a part of the reaction.

That being said, if we can fly Armoured Battleships into suns (nuclear fission reaction I know, but still exothermic) with remarkably little damage being dealt to them, then why the hell would anyone worry about a nuke. The fact is that the way damage is scaled at the moment, hitting a ship with a Nova Antimatter Cannon shot, is the equivalent to setting off another Big Bang.

[Image: signature.png]
Initial Biography ; Running Story
  Reply  
Offline sovereign
05-31-2008, 05:53 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 3,893
Threads: 38
Joined: Feb 2008

' Wrote:Hm, antimater weapons are way more efficient then nukes... why on earth would you bother with such old weapons...

Because their production is more easily hidden, and more compact? And frikken cool?

[Image: SCRAgenderheuristics.png]
  Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode