• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 17 18 19 20 21 … 780 Next »
Dumb stuff harms the game

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (35): « Previous 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 … 35 Next »
Thread Closed 
Dumb stuff harms the game
Offline Sniper
09-07-2020, 11:25 AM,
#261
Member
Posts: 150
Threads: 21
Joined: Aug 2016

(09-07-2020, 10:57 AM)Relation-Ship Wrote:
(09-07-2020, 10:34 AM)Sniper Wrote:
Oh look! Groshyr posted SIX Attack Threads... just another piss-of-players-like-Dublin sh**fest.

WHEN ARE THE GAME MASTERS GOING TO STEP IN AND FINALLY SORT THIS BEHAVIOUR OUT???
Point is, you shouldn't need to ask to get your ship added. You build a base on top of an existing faction's base I believe you should be obliged to make it an extension of it, provide service like buying pilots and sci-data when there's cap missions, or build it the hell somewhere else if it doesn't serve a useful purpose to the faction.


Also - come on, you complain about ONE PIECE OF RP. I see ZERO forum RP sent at IE the attackers? Just a very delayed and negative response to a different corsair group? Thing is, the owners decide to go the hostile + defense route with enemy factions, a fair (well, besides usual siege shenanigans like a repair ship, SHF and memeboats usages) siege and defense race, where attackers were just more committed and won. If they went the peaceful route, decided to RP at IE with offers and concessions then it would be plausible GMs to step in if roleplay was refused.

Not doing any RP and then OORP spamming all chat in the system (including when PvP dead) when Auxesia gives up is definitely not grounds for complaining

Buddy, I wasn't there - but from the Screenies they were not AI Daoine Saorise - indies perhaps? The base has been there for some time and built by the ONLY faction at that time as I understand - the AI D-S. And again you don't seem to understand - you cannot RP off that ONE pathetic, moronic, rubbish RP - that would be metagaming. And Eley, the faction leader would certainly not "go hostile". You are confused. That ORDER ships were also shooting is a disgrace!
Offline Groshyr
09-07-2020, 11:35 AM,
#262
Member
Posts: 3,894
Threads: 388
Joined: Mar 2018

Order ships were shooting the base? Prove this with evidence then
Offline xenomorph
09-07-2020, 11:36 AM,
#263
Indomitable Spirit
Posts: 346
Threads: 53
Joined: Oct 2019

(09-07-2020, 11:25 AM)Sniper Wrote: ... That ORDER ships were also shooting is a disgrace!

I wish I didn't need to jump into this discussion. The Order didn't siege the pob, they were there to shoot their common enemies — Nomads, Core, Auxesia. We didn't shoot any AI unless the AI shot us. We have nothing to do with the PoB. Thanks, I needed to point this out.
Offline Lemon
09-07-2020, 11:38 AM, (This post was last modified: 09-07-2020, 11:38 AM by Lemon.)
#264
The Legendary Lemon
Posts: 2,392
Threads: 114
Joined: Apr 2020

What do you mean RP off it?
You see a group siege your base - you contact the group in comms, that's not metagaming - the siege took 3 days. And ANY rp at IE happened only after the defenders have given up

As to the person who combat docked -/\l-Kappa
[+]Spoiler
[06.09.2020 23:26:59] /\l-Kappa: please hold fire
[06.09.2020 23:27:30] /\l-Kappa: El Pepe has an offer on the table. We want to parley
[06.09.2020 23:28:13] /\l-Kappa: to the Corsairs and ORder. Please cease to parley
[06.09.2020 23:30:11] 2020-09-06 23:30:13 SMT Traffic control alert: /\l-Kappa has requested to dock
[06.09.2020 23:30:12] 2020-09-06 23:30:14 SMT Traffic control alert: /\l-Kappa has requested to dock
[06.09.2020 23:35:30] /\l-Kappa: // Be reasonable gentlemen...
[06.09.2020 23:36:51] /\l-Kappa: We have never attacked Corsairs nor Order. Why the destruction?
[06.09.2020 23:37:52] /\l-Kappa: At the cost of both alienating the AI who are not enemies?
Offline Lythrilux
09-07-2020, 11:43 AM, (This post was last modified: 09-07-2020, 11:48 AM by Lythrilux.)
#265
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,369
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

It does seem like a grey though. Removing base defenders, even though you aren't explicitly sieging the base, is still technically attacking the base in some capacity. At the least, it's undermining its defences, which are meant to be warding off the siegers.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Offline Sniper
09-07-2020, 11:51 AM, (This post was last modified: 09-07-2020, 09:50 PM by Sniper.)
#266
Member
Posts: 150
Threads: 21
Joined: Aug 2016

(09-07-2020, 11:38 AM)Relation-Ship Wrote: What do you mean RP off it?

As to the person who combat docked -/\l-Kappa
[+]Spoiler
[06.09.2020 23:26:59] /\l-Kappa: please hold fire
[06.09.2020 23:27:30] /\l-Kappa: El Pepe has an offer on the table. We want to parley
[06.09.2020 23:28:13] /\l-Kappa: to the Corsairs and ORder. Please cease to parley
[06.09.2020 23:30:11] 2020-09-06 23:30:13 SMT Traffic control alert: /\l-Kappa has requested to dock
[06.09.2020 23:30:12] 2020-09-06 23:30:14 SMT Traffic control alert: /\l-Kappa has requested to dock
[06.09.2020 23:35:30] /\l-Kappa: // Be reasonable gentlemen...
[06.09.2020 23:36:51] /\l-Kappa: We have never attacked Corsairs nor Order. Why the destruction?
[06.09.2020 23:37:52] /\l-Kappa: At the cost of both alienating the AI who are not enemies?

This would probably be Eley, by the tone of the requests. And she is right. Nomads, Vagrants, Wild and Core are the only enemy AI have. And it proves that the rushing maggot collective are at it again... pissing people off and the GMs have yet to explain what they are doing about it. WHY ARE THE GM's AWOL?

My apologies to the Order. I assumed that you were there attacking seeing the ships on the screen shots. You were aiding the attackers just the same by "running interference" for them.
Offline Kanzler Niemann
09-07-2020, 11:56 AM,
#267
Bane of Roussillon
Posts: 1,637
Threads: 154
Joined: Jan 2013

(09-07-2020, 11:51 AM)Sniper Wrote:
(09-07-2020, 11:38 AM)Relation-Ship Wrote: What do you mean RP off it?

As to the person who combat docked -/\l-Kappa
[+]Spoiler
[06.09.2020 23:26:59] /\l-Kappa: please hold fire
[06.09.2020 23:27:30] /\l-Kappa: El Pepe has an offer on the table. We want to parley
[06.09.2020 23:28:13] /\l-Kappa: to the Corsairs and ORder. Please cease to parley
[06.09.2020 23:30:11] 2020-09-06 23:30:13 SMT Traffic control alert: /\l-Kappa has requested to dock
[06.09.2020 23:30:12] 2020-09-06 23:30:14 SMT Traffic control alert: /\l-Kappa has requested to dock
[06.09.2020 23:35:30] /\l-Kappa: // Be reasonable gentlemen...
[06.09.2020 23:36:51] /\l-Kappa: We have never attacked Corsairs nor Order. Why the destruction?
[06.09.2020 23:37:52] /\l-Kappa: At the cost of both alienating the AI who are not enemies?

This would probably be Eley, by the tone of the requests. And she is right. Nomads, Vagrants, Wild and Core are the only enemy AI have. And it proves that the Russian maggot collective are at it again... pissing people off and the GMs have yet to explain what they are doing about it. WHY ARE THE GM's AWOL?

My apologies to the Order. I assumed that you were there attacking seeing the ships on the screen shots.

Never heard such nonsense, to be honest. Nomads enemies of the AI? The Nomads can't even communicate with you lmao. Literally no idea how and why the GMs should step in, maybe to finally close this thread. Pobs can and will be sieged someday get over it.

[Image: giphy.webp]
Offline Lemon
09-07-2020, 12:02 PM,
#268
The Legendary Lemon
Posts: 2,392
Threads: 114
Joined: Apr 2020

(09-07-2020, 11:51 AM)Sniper Wrote:
(09-07-2020, 11:38 AM)Relation-Ship Wrote: What do you mean RP off it?

As to the person who combat docked -/\l-Kappa
[+]Spoiler
[06.09.2020 23:26:59] /\l-Kappa: please hold fire
[06.09.2020 23:27:30] /\l-Kappa: El Pepe has an offer on the table. We want to parley
[06.09.2020 23:28:13] /\l-Kappa: to the Corsairs and ORder. Please cease to parley
[06.09.2020 23:30:11] 2020-09-06 23:30:13 SMT Traffic control alert: /\l-Kappa has requested to dock
[06.09.2020 23:30:12] 2020-09-06 23:30:14 SMT Traffic control alert: /\l-Kappa has requested to dock
[06.09.2020 23:35:30] /\l-Kappa: // Be reasonable gentlemen...
[06.09.2020 23:36:51] /\l-Kappa: We have never attacked Corsairs nor Order. Why the destruction?
[06.09.2020 23:37:52] /\l-Kappa: At the cost of both alienating the AI who are not enemies?

This would probably be Eley, by the tone of the requests. And she is right. Nomads, Vagrants, Wild and Core are the only enemy AI have. And it proves that the Russian maggot collective are at it again... pissing people off and the GMs have yet to explain what they are doing about it. WHY ARE THE GM's AWOL?

My apologies to the Order. I assumed that you were there attacking seeing the ships on the screen shots.
Cmon get real
until the base got to 100million
AI Was constantly shooting at the attackers with freelancer that refused contracts from the other side, nomads and auxesia.
And wiped corsairs numerous times. I know because I was on the nomads and AI (and tried on Core)
This (PvP dead) "peaceful" RP came only when it was clear the defence is failing after 3 days of constant fights - there was no attempt at RP before then with IE, only a half assed delayed response to Pepe who's in a different corsair faction . Gms won't help you here, it was a fair siege and defense where defenders lost
Offline Banned player t202085
09-07-2020, 12:04 PM,
#269
Member
Posts: 1,112
Threads: 121
Joined: Dec 2009

(09-07-2020, 11:51 AM)Sniper Wrote: And it proves that the Russian maggot collective are at it again... pissing people off and the GMs have yet to explain what they are doing about it. WHY ARE THE GM's AWOL?

1 - There is a process for seiging pobs, breaking this process isn't acceptable. In this case the attacking force followed the correct procedure. It's part of the game move on with your story.

2 - "Russian maggot" is not acceptable and is a racial slur. Edit your post or expect people to sanctionlancer you.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=202085
Time left: (Permanent)
Offline Kauket
09-07-2020, 12:24 PM,
#270
Dark Lord of the Birbs
Posts: 6,632
Threads: 515
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles:
Art Developer

(09-07-2020, 11:43 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: It does seem like a grey though. Removing base defenders, even though you aren't explicitly sieging the base, is still technically attacking the base in some capacity. At the least, it's undermining its defences, which are meant to be warding off the siegers.

This. Khara was sanctioned exactly for this

[Image: kauket.gif]
Pages (35): « Previous 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 … 35 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode