• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 375 376 377 378 379 … 547 Next »
Players docking on other Player aircraft

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »
Players docking on other Player aircraft
Offline swift
03-12-2009, 07:37 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 2,838
Threads: 61
Joined: Jul 2008

' Wrote:This would be pretty sweet under ideal conditions, however...

1.Carrier owner deletes Char, where does it leave you?
Refer to point three, he logs it off, you automatically die and respawn at your last station.
Quote:2.Carrier owner goes to Bastille, where do you go since you become cargo?
Yes, cause this will happen once in a year, so it is an enormous problem we must address.
Right.
And even if we must somehow solve it, it is solved by the admin simply using the .kill command and then transferring the player to Bastille, so that the ships docked shall also die, and those ships that were docked will respawn at their last station.

Quote:3.You want to undock from a ship that isn't online, what are the results?
Don't make it a save point when you dock at a carrier, meaning, if you die, or it dies, or it logs off, you will respawn at your last station.


And Sindroms, that's not a very good attitude with your "Then go play Flak, we don't need to advance Discovey further."
Although Discovery is very advanced, nothing can ever be perfect, or have it all. We must strive for improving it as much as possible, so it will be -even better-.

Now there's not really too much problems with this, and if someone can mention a few more, I'll be glad to try and disprove them.

We need to be open for ideas, not jump like hounds to tear every one up.


<span style="font-familyTonguealatino Linotype">
<span style="color:#000000">All morons hate it when you call them a moron.
</span></span>
<span style="color:#33FFFF">The CFF</span>
<span style="color:#33FF33">CFF Communication Channel and RP Collection</span>
  Reply  
Offline hribek
03-12-2009, 07:41 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-12-2009, 07:47 AM by hribek.)
#12
Member
Posts: 1,159
Threads: 61
Joined: Dec 2007

For this to work, there has to be a special base in every system that the player is docked with while "inside the carrier". Then he/she is beamed to the position of the carrier upon undocking.

Needless to say, it might be possible but 4.85 is out, so enjoy it. Sure, there's many things possible to implement, but we just didn't have the time or mood to do it.

And Cannon's to-do list of FLHook plugins is waaaaaaay looong right now, I bet. All in due time.
Reply  
Offline Altaris
03-12-2009, 08:22 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-12-2009, 08:22 AM by Altaris.)
#13
Member
Posts: 780
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2008

Sorry to jumping to this conversation, but Disco is RP sever not PvP like Flak88. LEts say you will dock on Battleship before big fight. You get killed. And you will respawn back on that BS. You will have to leave system due the server rules. Am i right?

[Image: 101st-banner-captain.png]
Carnage itself flying within void...
Proud cardihead ever since 2008...
You all gonna eat cardi!
...also im a troll, so hate me.
  Reply  
Guest
03-12-2009, 08:27 AM,
#14
Unregistered
 

Dont get me wrong, all i was saying, is that we should be grateful for what we allready have, Swift..
Reply  
Niezck
03-12-2009, 01:03 PM,
#15
Unregistered
 

It can, in fact, be done. Pretty much how Hirbek said. However, Cannon has about 1001 things to do, and it's increasing by the day, so ...
Reply  
Offline swift
03-12-2009, 01:55 PM,
#16
Member
Posts: 2,838
Threads: 61
Joined: Jul 2008

' Wrote:Dont get me wrong, all i was saying, is that we should be grateful for what we allready have, Swift..
I know, I didn't mean to attack you if that's what it looked like.
And I most certainly am grateful for everything we have in this mod, and there's not much more things missing.
All I said is that we can't ever allow ourselves to say, okay, let's not advance anything further.

I do realize though, that the workload is quite high on the devs, and especially Cannon, who does all the FLHook programming.
Just saying that we need to sift good ideas from the bad, but not discourage ideas with non-arguments.
We need to encourage people to share their suggestions.

<span style="font-familyTonguealatino Linotype">
<span style="color:#000000">All morons hate it when you call them a moron.
</span></span>
<span style="color:#33FFFF">The CFF</span>
<span style="color:#33FF33">CFF Communication Channel and RP Collection</span>
  Reply  
Offline Emilio
03-12-2009, 02:23 PM,
#17
Member
Posts: 26
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2007

You, guys, should talk to Dev, the main coder of FLhook. He coded his program to allow for the use of carriers with an onboard equipment store for resupply, and also, system to system jumpdrives which allows a capital ship or carrier to jump from New Tokyo to New London in mere moments. These features are going to be use in another mod when it comes out.

[Image: TurisSig-1.png]
  Reply  
Offline sempai17
03-12-2009, 02:32 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 480
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2008

perhaps we should look into Alpha testing of this idea to see if it can be implemented on discvoery before we completely shoot it down.

I for one, belive it would help the RP experience, also give more incentive to fly more fighters into battle, rather than the usual "cap spam"

[Image: Cmdrtoliman.png]
&lt;Liberty Criminal Entry Form&gt; &lt;Liberty Criminal Log&gt;
[Image: sarge17bravo.png]
  Reply  
Offline ophidian
03-12-2009, 03:50 PM,
#19
Member
Posts: 1,421
Threads: 68
Joined: Jan 2009

At least carriers can have the option of releasing 2-3 NPC fighters to make them look like carriers. In many PvP fights (almost all), a NPC wing of the enemy or your side appears anyway.

Why not making them appear from a carrier rather than them "interestingly" finding the battle seconds after it starts, out of nowhere?

[Image: rand-back.png]
  Reply  
Offline El Nino
03-12-2009, 03:57 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 1,248
Threads: 25
Joined: Dec 2007

Well if someone codes it and makes it, it has no problem, we could put it in, no reason not to do it... except reengagement rules and such...

Donate to the Poor Pilot's Fundation via Sirius Bank /givecash GreenHawk 1000000 now, and support poor pilots sirius wide!
Skype: jure.grbec
My primary char: Jose El Nino - Corsair Elder captain of the SS Greenhawk

Currently Inactive due to pursuit of life long dreams, will be back...*edited* As promised am back.

[Image: opgbar.gif][Image: rightbar.jpg]
[Image: Sungi_sig.png]
  Reply  
Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode