Locking the Ecchi/Kawaii Thread.

[Dusty Lens]

I was also surprised about the lock. I was about to post an image of two girls in skimpy housemaid uniforms making out in a tub of squid when I spotted that Blodo had shut it down.

I mean, what's going on?

Questioning the Angel Fire picks is just sour grapes to be brutally honest.

But I'll assure you, if he ever posts images of them jumping each other's bones Blodo'll lock the thread.

Since I know you both have ready access to myself and others over skype I'll just assume you need to get it out of your system by posting about on the forum and leave you to it. Ta!

[Dusty Lens]

* Why were these specific pictures not removed and a warning issued?

Because the best course of action is at the discretion of the moderator who chooses to shut it down.

* Why was the thread locked with no proper explanation? (Instead I find some of Dusty's and Blodo's very helpful humour.)

Good question, ask Blodo.

* Why were no PM's distributed as to why they were locked? (I had to PM a moderator, whose answers were rather vague.

Good question, ask Blodo.

It is really your choice to enter the thread, especially when there are plenty of warnings telling your exactly what is going on.

Not how it works.

[n00bl3t]

I was also surprised about the lock. I was about to post an image of two girls in skimpy housemaid uniforms making out in a tub of squid when I spotted that Blodo had shut it down.

I mean, what's going on?

Questioning the Angel Fire picks is just sour grapes to be brutally honest.

But I'll assure you, if he ever posts images of them jumping each other's bones Blodo'll lock the thread.

Since I know you both have ready access to myself and others over skype I'll just assume you need a witch hunt to get it out of your system and leave you to it. Ta!

If it was too skimpy, and was past ecchi, as you suggest with the squid, which I presume to mean tentacles, either me or Jessicka would have asked that you remove it.

I am not logging onto Skype since I am on the slow laptop.

No witch hunt, I just want a proper reasoning or the thread back. (With some limiting conditions on questionable content, if it is believed that the current content pushes it too far.)

Because the best course of action is at the discretion of the moderator who chooses to shut it down.
Good question, ask Blodo.
Good question, ask Blodo.
Not how it works.

Blodo has been continuously vague.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Exsiled_one]

yeah, 1000 yearold priestess looking like 12yearold is still a 12yearold.
Highschool girl looking like 12yearold is still 12yearold.
12 12 something something, WEASEL PIES

No, seriously, there's more profanity and explaining to be made about two 10000 yearold priestess making out than in chick holding out a notebook.

---

<span style="color:#33CC00">I AM GIVING AWAY MONEY TO CREATIVE MINDS*</span>

[n00bl3t]

yeah, 1000 yearold priestess looking like 12yearold is still a 12yearold.
Highschool girl looking like 12yearold is still 12yearold.
12 12 something something, WEASEL PIES

No, seriously, there's more profanity and explaining to be made about two 10000 yearold priestess making out than in chick holding out a notebook.

If they were making out with someone who looked older, I could understand your concern.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Tenacity]

yea, because kids having sex with kids is totally fine!











(in a perfect world, it would be...)

---

[n00bl3t]

yea, because kids having sex with kids is totally fine!
(in a perfect world, it would be...)

Clothed kissing. Not orgy. *Facepalms.*

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Pinko]

When we had obvious cases of lolicons, we asked them to be removed, too.

---

I want to get off Mr. Igiss' wild ride.

[n00bl3t]

When we had obvious cases of lolicons, we asked them to be removed, too.

Posted by Tenacity, ironically.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Tenacity]

hey now, this thread isnt about me >.>

---