• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 479 480 481 482 483 … 779 Next »
Disco 4.86 Update 2: Bomber weapon discussion

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Kusari Super Alloy Shipments - 2,049,450 / 2,500,000
LSF Arms Shipments - 205,090 / 2,000,000
LSF Munition Shipments - 164,031 / 2,000,000
Pirate Black Market Shipments - 618,970 / 1,000,000
Dragon Bounties - 16 / 10,000
KOI Bounties - 52 / 10,000
LSF Bounties - 37 / 10,000
Samura Bounties - 5 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Disco 4.86 Update 2: Bomber weapon discussion
Offline Fletcher
10-29-2009, 04:58 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-29-2009, 05:44 PM by Fletcher.)
#1
Member
Posts: 5,473
Threads: 952
Joined: Apr 2008

Hey folks, I've not had the chance to test the altered bomber weapons yet, even in Update 1 I hadn't had a good go at them.

Igiss Wrote:- Bomber gun changes: less range, less refire, more dispersion, new models by Doom

How has the 2nd update altered the bomber weapons effectiveness in combat? I'm not much of a bomber pilot any more, but I know there is a niche of players who are bombers.

EDIT: I think I best put statistics of the old guns from Update 1, then paste in the stats for the new ones. Give me bit.

Update 1 bomber weapon stats

Bomber Energy Cannon
  • Hull Damage - 1250
  • Shield Damage - 625
  • Power Usage - 225
  • Re-fire - 4.00
  • Speed - 350m/s
  • Range - 950m
Bomber EMP Cannon
  • Hull Damage - 80
  • Shield Damage - 1000
  • Power Usage - 260
  • Re-fire - 4.00
  • Speed - 350m/s
  • Range - 950m
Update 2 bomber weapon stats - Cheers Nerevar

Bomber Energy Cannon
  • Hull Damage - 1250
  • Shield Damage - 625
  • Power Usage - 225
  • Re-fire - 3.03
  • Speed - 350m/s
  • Range - 770m
Bomber EMP Cannon
  • Hull Damage - 80
  • Shield Damage - 1040
  • Power Usage - 260
  • Re-fire - 3.03
  • Speed- 350m/s
  • Range - 770m

[Image: 7220a57d19cexl1.jpg]
"Oh chuffing blimey, another day, another person being whiney!"
Fletcher's Feedback and Stories Thread
Reply  
Offline Ash
10-29-2009, 05:09 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,261
Threads: 265
Joined: Feb 2008

I'd imagine they've been nerfed down to reality. They were just too good for the last update.

[Image: B305-A724-C3-D9-4-D19-83-EF-92-B478-B8-F595.png]
  Reply  
Offline Nerevar
10-29-2009, 05:35 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-29-2009, 05:36 PM by Nerevar.)
#3
Member
Posts: 13
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2009

Update 2 bomber weapon stats

Bomber Energy Cannon

* Hull Damage - 1250
* Shield Damage - 625
* Power Usage - 225
* Re-fire - 3.03
* Speed - 350m/s
* Range - 770m

Bomber EMP Cannon

* Hull Damage - 80
* Shield Damage - 1040
* Power Usage - 260
* Re-fire - 3.03
* Speed - 350m/s
* Range - 770m

That's what I got from in-game infocards. If the information is correct, then the only changes seem to be in the refire rate. And 40 extra shield damage for the EMP cannon.

[Image: Gallic_sig_v2.png]
  Reply  
Offline Fletcher
10-29-2009, 05:40 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 5,473
Threads: 952
Joined: Apr 2008

Cheers Nerevar, as you said, it seems to be a rather minor adjustment in terms of firepower, but the slower refire may alter is some more.

Lets wait and see.

[Image: 7220a57d19cexl1.jpg]
"Oh chuffing blimey, another day, another person being whiney!"
Fletcher's Feedback and Stories Thread
Reply  
Offline Othman
10-29-2009, 05:41 PM,
#5
Member
Posts: 2,011
Threads: 49
Joined: May 2007

Ranges were nerfed from 950 to 770 and the refires from 4.00 to 3.03. Rest of the stats are the same. Main reason of this change was because cruisers were being chewed up rather quick. I'd still like to hear what people think about the changes after spending some time with them.

On the uncharted lagoons of anguish, I sail with a canoe made of my sins.
  Reply  
Offline darthbeck
10-29-2009, 05:42 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 2,457
Threads: 112
Joined: Jan 2009

I'd still like to see bomber EMP guns act more like infernos. Oh well...

' Wrote:<span style="font-family:Century Gothic">Violence is Golden</span>
  Reply  
Offline Boss
10-29-2009, 05:53 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 5,125
Threads: 101
Joined: Jan 2008

Old range was around 950. New range is 770? This earns Boss' Stamp of Fail.


Zealot Wrote:Just go play the game and have fun dammit.
Treewyrm Wrote:all in all the conclusion is that disco doesn't need antagonist factions, it doesn't need phantoms, it doesn't need nomads, it doesn't need coalition and it doesn't need many other things, no AIs, the game is hijacked by morons to confuse the game with their dickwaving generic competition games mixed up with troll-of-the-day.
Reply  
Offline Fletcher
10-29-2009, 06:00 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 5,473
Threads: 952
Joined: Apr 2008

' Wrote:Old range was around 950. New range is 770? This earns Boss' Stamp of Fail.
I think it was altered so to stop the cruisers being annihilated. That was the reasoning behind it I think. But I have no idea personally since I'm a bad bomber pilot.

[Image: 7220a57d19cexl1.jpg]
"Oh chuffing blimey, another day, another person being whiney!"
Fletcher's Feedback and Stories Thread
Reply  
Offline Weedalot
10-29-2009, 06:01 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 2,364
Threads: 38
Joined: Oct 2008

' Wrote:I've tried them, they're crap, just like almost everything else in this update.

If they want to nerf the range and refire, then energy cost needs to be lowered and damage needs to be raised. Simple as that.
Thats the spirit:(

Oh well as a Bomberwhore i must say i am not so happy.. but i will deal and get used to it.. so shall the rest.

The bomber in the last update was good, and i am sure this one wont change the facts 2.5 hits on shields and thee is no shields to worry about (for fighters) Against caps this will effect the outcome.. Not so great in my opinion but nothing to get too worried about

♠ Because we can ♠
  Reply  
Offline Fletcher
10-29-2009, 06:10 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 5,473
Threads: 952
Joined: Apr 2008

Just had a go with the Energy Cannon loadout with an Upholder vs a Barghest, the Cannons are quite hard to be effective. It takes 5 seconds of concentrated fire to drop enemy shields.

[Image: 7220a57d19cexl1.jpg]
"Oh chuffing blimey, another day, another person being whiney!"
Fletcher's Feedback and Stories Thread
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode