• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 410 411 412 413 414 … 780 Next »
A couple of questions about the Conneticut sytem

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
A couple of questions about the Conneticut sytem
Offline MB52
06-23-2010, 05:50 PM,
#11
Member
Posts: 1,973
Threads: 130
Joined: Dec 2007

My idea... is to put a one way jumphole in every major system/near freeports.

There would be no way out of the system, no jumpholes out, so you'd have to die to get out. (All bases would be removed)

Basically all jumpholes in would be placed next to a "neutral" station like a freeport, allowing people to dock there before they enter the PVP system.

How it would work is... Player A from Theta wants to go PVP, so he docks on FP9, then flies in. Where he meets player B from Tau 31, who had just docked at FP10.

They get into a PVP battle and Player B dies. He re spawns at FP10 where he can resupply and re-enter the PVP system if he likes.

Player A is now bored with PVP and wishes to leave, so he flies into a mine field and dies. Thus re spawning at FP9, where he can get on with his life.

For those who cannot dock on a freeport, (the few) they can have a jumphole in placed by one of their bases.


I’ll carry this flag
To the grave if I must
Because it’s flag that I love
And a flag that I trust
  Reply  
Online Tommeh
06-23-2010, 05:51 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 1,596
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2009

' Wrote:How about we remove conn's jumphole?

/restart connecticut

then /restart fighter bomber gunboat gfunship and so on.
Base sells all class 8 and 9 guns and cap equippment.

Ship can be set up for free, but it cannot leave the system.

This one sounds pretty good.

[Image: final3.png]
Reply  
Offline Ceoran
06-23-2010, 06:41 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 1,867
Threads: 34
Joined: Sep 2008

' Wrote:To bad traders don't die in conn and just take the hole next to the other major house.

I think he was suggesting one-way holes so you can't exit without dying at all.

' Wrote:How about we remove conn's jumphole?

/restart connecticut

then /restart fighter bomber gunboat gfunship and so on.
Base sells all class 8 and 9 guns and cap equippment.

Ship can be set up for free, but it cannot leave the system.

sounds like this would require to double all those items and make the mod size unnecessary huge. And I can imagine it takes a lot of work to set up all the restart commands just to make an oorp-system fit into a rp-server.

[Image: signaturr.gif]
My Stories Outcast laws and structures Join Samura|-
' Wrote:Go play the game, within the given limitations. That is how role play games are played. Not by trying to work around those limitations or whining about them.
Reply  
Offline William Frederick Cody
06-23-2010, 06:52 PM,
#14
Member
Posts: 1,852
Threads: 180
Joined: Sep 2007

Do we need conneticut any longer? There is a discovery of discovery server also. Isnt that enough?

Lets kill conneticut!

Idiocy and blind spots. Hidden features for veteran players. Inform yourself here|Codenames and their locations

[Image: QLRpcZ1.png]
[url=http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=17248]SpacePics
|False Friends|Tom Waits|Die Ärzte|Awful German Language|Cody's feedback thread|Cody' job board
  Reply  
Offline Garrett Jax
06-23-2010, 07:19 PM,
#15
Xenomorph Admin
Posts: 2,730
Threads: 599
Joined: Feb 2009

' Wrote:I'd suggest a more neutral location for the jump hole, where every faction can get to. Or maybe jump holes in each capital systems leading to connecticut, then taking that jump hole again would lead back to the system you entered Conn from. Not sure if that's possible.


While that suggestion makes it easier for distant factions to enter Conneticut, I think this may cause the problem we're having in Liberty to be the problem with every system that has access to Conn.

Maybe just move the jumphole out of Liberty to a neutral site. Don't have to worry about changing anything else. Seems to me to be the simplest, most effective solution out there.

[Image: rSYoqYY.png]
Reply  
Offline SeaFalcon
06-23-2010, 07:20 PM,
#16
Member
Posts: 3,044
Threads: 101
Joined: Aug 2009

' Wrote:How about we remove conn's jumphole?

/restart connecticut

then /restart fighter bomber gunboat gfunship and so on.
Base sells all class 8 and 9 guns and cap equippment.

Ship can be set up for free, but it cannot leave the system.

AYE!
That way you can test new layouts etc.
Let's hope the system won't get spammed for ultimate pvp use D:
Reply  
Offline Evan_
06-23-2010, 07:25 PM,
#17
Member
Posts: 1,472
Threads: 28
Joined: Dec 2009

' Wrote:Do we need conneticut any longer? There is a discovery of discovery server also. Isnt that enough?

Lets kill conneticut!

/signed

Every time I fail to connect to the serv in peak hours I think about all those people in an OORP system..

[Image: evan_85.gif]
Reply  
Offline masternerdguy
06-23-2010, 08:55 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 936
Threads: 142
Joined: Jun 2009

i suggest multiple entrances. Using it as an OORP trade shortcuz could be a bannable/sanctionable offense.

[Image: allenstews.1.png]
Quote:Send the fat kid in to see if its a trap
Reply  
Offline Birdtalon
06-23-2010, 09:08 PM,
#19
Member
Posts: 2,053
Threads: 93
Joined: Apr 2009

' Wrote:i suggest multiple entrances. Using it as an OORP trade shortcuz could be a bannable/sanctionable offense.

And of course that rule is easy to enforce?

[Image: MiPYb7j.png]
  Reply  
Offline jxie93
06-23-2010, 09:16 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 3,740
Threads: 80
Joined: Sep 2009

' Wrote:And of course that rule is easy to enforce?

It doesn't need to be enforced.

Just amend the Conneticut rule to "transports in this system are free to be engaged".

I personally prefer the multiple access suggestion, less messing around with the mod.

Just place on in each house's core system, New Berlin, New Tokyo, etc.


[Image: jxie93.gif]
*Signature Walkthrough* | *deviantART Gallery* | *Graphics Repository*
  Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode