• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 360 361 362 363 364 … 386 Next »
BAF Faction Status

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »
BAF Faction Status
Offline Dieter Schprokets
09-09-2008, 04:53 AM,
#1
Member
Posts: 4,394
Threads: 662
Joined: Jul 2007

Revised BAF Faction Status Entry

Drew heavily on Unselie's old one. It was a good one.

Have a look-see and comment:

1) Backstory : Sound Good? Trevelyan, did I summarize recent political history ok?

2) Privateers : Blunt et al, happy with it? No ranks, as requested.

3) Roster : Miss anybody? Get anyone's rank messed up?

Note that I took the liberty of promoting a few people, especially those who kept QCRF alive recently

(Winks at Marvin..)

4) Capitals : Accurate list? I think some ships are there that no longer exist.

I'll revise as needed

[Image: siggy.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Turkish
09-09-2008, 05:05 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,617
Threads: 50
Joined: Aug 2007

Is very good.

[Image: LibreIISuper_Small.png]

I have a fetish for all things Norse.
  Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
09-09-2008, 05:06 AM, (This post was last modified: 09-09-2008, 05:08 AM by bluntpencil2001.)
#3
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

Nice, nice. Perhaps a mention that 'officially' the Privateers are mercs hired by Stuart, in order to gain some deniability if it all goes tits-up.

I also believe that the Revenge is Privateer.

Also, we're in the process of making dodgy Privateer Fireflies. Should be fun.:D

All in all, kick ass. Those squinty northerners won't see us coming!:P

Oh, also, the map mentions QCRF instead of BAF. :/

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Dieter Schprokets
09-09-2008, 05:16 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 4,394
Threads: 662
Joined: Jul 2007

' Wrote:Nice, nice. Perhaps a mention that 'officially' the Privateers are mercs hired by Stuart, in order to gain some deniability if it all goes tits-up.

I also believe that the Revenge is Privateer.

Also, we're in the process of making dodgy Privateer Fireflies. Should be fun.:D

All in all, kick ass. Those squinty northerners won't see us coming!:P

Oh, also, the map mentions QCRF instead of BAF. :/

Keeping all caps on cap list, including Privateers.

Added to Privateer description.

And can't do much about the map..

[Image: siggy.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Cawdor
09-09-2008, 02:04 PM,
#5
Member
Posts: 1,859
Threads: 211
Joined: Mar 2008

I will make a new map this evening. And remove this relic of a flag. its not quite up to date.

Edit: oh and you forgot to add the admiral's rank to the rank-list.

.

[Image: Norway.png]

.
  Reply  
Offline beander2
09-09-2008, 02:09 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 759
Threads: 38
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:Revised BAF Faction Status Entry

Drew heavily on Unselie's old one. It was a good one.

Have a look-see and comment:

1) Backstory : Sound Good? Trevelyan, did I summarize recent political history ok?

I think it's quite good, Dieter. Well done.

Only two comments: I think you should delete "arrogant" before "assessment" in your description of the Royalist reaction to the Populists. Since the Royalists are your backers, you don't want to make them look bad, and most of the BAF probably agrees with their primary political position.

Also, I'm not sure you should list the Federalists on your diplomacy yet. We haven't even done a faction proposal yet as we're still getting organized, getting known in-game, and raising money for the proposal. At this point, we're just an RP group.

When we are listed, I'm also wondering if we should be under "hostile." Our stated goal is to dismantle the monarchy and the industrial complex that supports it. I don't think we could be more explicitly against the current government. That said, it doesn't mean we have to be KoS and that the RP of a cautious stance couldn't still be maintained. My hunch, of course, is that the caution won't last long once we get into interdicting trade more aggressively.

[Image: kbeb.png] Sir Alisdair Buchanan, KBE ~ Gateway)Trafalgar

[Image: Gateway-fin.png]
  Reply  
Offline Stoat
09-09-2008, 02:27 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 2,133
Threads: 90
Joined: Aug 2007

Good work Dieter. I'm glad that ranks have gone from the Privateers.

[Image: Sig3.png]
My Stories
Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
09-09-2008, 03:20 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

Right, after some discussion and thinking et cetera, I've decided...

Privateers, get your rep up with the Junkers, and buy Pirate IDs from them.

Pirate IDs indicate that you are a pirate, affiliaed with your IFF (BAF). Works for me, and anyone that says otherwise is getting keelhauled.:P

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Stoat
09-09-2008, 03:26 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 2,133
Threads: 90
Joined: Aug 2007

' Wrote:Right, after some discussion and thinking et cetera, I've decided...

Privateers, get your rep up with the Junkers, and buy Pirate IDs from them.

Pirate IDs indicate that you are a pirate, affiliaed with your IFF (BAF). Works for me, and anyone that says otherwise is getting keelhauled.:P

Didn't we run across problems with this when we were first starting out? OoRP mix of IFF and ID, or something.....

Works for me too though.

[Image: Sig3.png]
My Stories
Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
09-09-2008, 03:29 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

' Wrote:Didn't we run across problems with this when we were first starting out? OoRP mix of IFF and ID, or something.....

Works for me too though.

By my assessment of current bollocks on the forums, it will be the best of a bad bunch. Meh. We'll do it, damn the consequences! For the Queen, Glory and a full wallet!

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode