• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 73 74 75 76 77 … 547 Next »
Idea about SNAC/Nova Torpedo

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Idea about SNAC/Nova Torpedo
Offline Titan*
04-10-2016, 04:45 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-10-2016, 05:28 PM by Titan*.)
#1
Developer
Posts: 1,077
Threads: 88
Joined: Jul 2013

How about changing Nova torpedo and SNAC to;

Nova Torpedo;
Unguided Torpedo
1.000M range
250.000 or 300.000 hull damage but 25k Shield damage so people can use incapacitator torpedo more often
200 m/s speed
15k or 20k Hitpoints
15 or 20s reload time
increase the energy req so bombers cant fire 2 torps at the same time
More mass so they cannot be deflected by BS Flaks
2 or 3 Flak salvo should destroy the Nova Torpedo

Bombers will become real dive bomber or torpedo bomber

About Snacs;
SNACs better than nova torpedo atm because nova torp can't hit a Battleship that have flaks also it cant hit cruiser and gunboat too
SNACs should be effective vs Gunboats/Cruisers
Nova Torpedo should be effective vs Battleships only

Battleships will have more chance against bombers because bombers have to get close to hit with Nova Torpedo, using SNACs to kill a Battleship will take very long time

Discuss?
Reply  
Offline Epo
04-10-2016, 04:49 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 1,706
Threads: 109
Joined: Jul 2014

+1 Bombers are literally get a nova and don't care about the rest. Specialised ones to focus either on hull / shield would be cool
Reply  
Offline Operator
04-10-2016, 04:58 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 1,068
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2015

Agreed. Bombers are must be Bombers, not an another fighter for snub pew, they're supposed to dive and annoy caps, not snubs.
  Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
04-10-2016, 05:07 PM,
#4
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

I have always loved the idea of unguided torpedo bombers.

You have to choose whether you go close to increase your chance of a hit, or stay away far and likely miss.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline Antonio
04-10-2016, 05:14 PM,
#5
PvP = RP
Posts: 3,192
Threads: 196
Joined: Nov 2009
Staff roles: Systems Lead

You want bombers to be better against cruisers and gunboats and then suggest nerfing the snac damage by 50%. Bombers are fine, stop trying to fix them and instead focus on buffing battleships. They are still the worst class in the game and die to everything.

[Image: BMdBL0j.png]
SNAC Montage Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Thruster SNAC
Reply  
Offline Epo
04-10-2016, 05:18 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 1,706
Threads: 109
Joined: Jul 2014

(04-10-2016, 05:14 PM)Antonio Wrote: You want bombers to be better against cruisers and gunboats and then suggest nerfing the snac damage by 50%. Bombers are fine, stop trying to fix them and instead focus on buffing battleships. They are still the worst class in the game and die to everything.

Buff battleships? Via conversation on forums? It's a no way to happen. Will only cause some drama around.
I'd agree they should be somehow buffed tho
Reply  
Offline Shiki
04-10-2016, 05:18 PM,
#7
UwU
Posts: 2,754
Threads: 121
Joined: May 2015

(04-10-2016, 04:45 PM)Titan Wrote: Bombers

[Image: 33596901.jpg]

[Image: loyolabully.gif]
[Image: Q5rd5YU.png]
Reply  
Offline Omi
04-10-2016, 05:19 PM,
#8
By Unpopular Demand
Posts: 1,716
Threads: 87
Joined: Aug 2007

These proposals in their current state are, frankly, ridiculous. The SNAC already barely does damage to anything larger than a gunboat; even with four or more bombers, it takes an immense amount of effort and time to kill anything larger than a cruiser without the usage of Nova torpedoes. Even if you forego your cruise disruptor (as most bombers have to) for a Nova torp, battlecruisers and above are capable of flakking the torpedoes off course - and half the time, a BC can manoeuver out of the way anyway.

The idea that bombers are overpowered right now against capital ships is something I simply cannot fathom. The amount of effort, sweat, and tears that goes into deploying a bomber squadron against a sizable capital ship force is far imbalanced against the bombers, particularly when instakill weaponry like razors comes into the equation. Furthermore, a Nova bomber has absolutely no defense against being picked apart by fighters, since without a cruise disruptor there is almost no threat of it deshielding you via a minetrap.

tl;dr bombers without a Nova already do next to no damage to capitals, bombers with a Nova are easily killed by having fighter escorts. Capital ships (particularly battleships) are not meant to be deployed without support.

[Image: omicega.gif]
Reply  
Offline Titan*
04-10-2016, 05:21 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-10-2016, 05:22 PM by Titan*.)
#9
Developer
Posts: 1,077
Threads: 88
Joined: Jul 2013

(04-10-2016, 05:14 PM)Antonio Wrote: You want bombers to be better against cruisers and gunboats and then suggest nerfing the snac damage by 50%. Bombers are fine, stop trying to fix them and instead focus on buffing battleships. They are still the worst class in the game and die to everything.

yeah bombers are fine, group of bomber kills group of fighters
This thread about Nova Torpedo though, I said "MAYBE lower the snac damage by %50"
Nova Torpedo is worthless, does nothing but dies to flaks or deflected by flaks
So making them unguided torpedo would be better, Sitting 5k away from a Battleship and firing worthless armies of nova torpedo that dies to flak fire is boring
Also it would be better for battleships too if they get close, BS can hit bombers more often
Reply  
Offline Ramke
04-10-2016, 05:24 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-10-2016, 05:26 PM by Ramke.)
#10
Member
Posts: 1,771
Threads: 76
Joined: Dec 2008

Nerfing the SNAC will ultimately make the bomber class worth less than light fighters without proper alternatives, as the SNAC itself deals 1/3 of a GB's hull as damage if the target is using CAU8.
Nova torpedoes are dodged easily and/or flakked even more easily.

Do you think 1/6 of hull damage is okay on agile, small and significant dps gunboats?

You need two skilled and well-coordinated bomber pilots to even put up a fighting chance against a cruiser or battleship with SNACs, and experienced cap pilots will dodge novas most of the time anyway. Not to mention the fight will take 20-30 minutes against a single player, god forbid someone comes to help during that time.

All in all, I think they should change bombers -only if- they have worthwhile alternatives that still give them a fighting chance. Nerfed SNACs will just force them to become snub sniping platforms as they lose their only reliable damage dealer to the point where a light fighter can do better.
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode