• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 45 46 47 48 49 … 55 Next »
coudl we possibly?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »
coudl we possibly?
Offline Cosmos
11-29-2008, 04:19 AM,
#1
Member
Posts: 1,208
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2008

could we possibly have the Bretonian Bomber thinend out a bit? or remodeled too make it thinner, its not nearly half as good as any other bomber, and since ive been using it ive found out why its so much harder too fly than the praetorian, at the moment, its like flying a brick...

Thanks.

[Image: .png]
[22:50:33] ☆ҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳEternal†Nightmareҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳ☆(illi): i cyber with leather torps (smoking)
  Reply  
Offline Rudo
12-02-2008, 05:02 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 1,411
Threads: 55
Joined: Jul 2008

Fly the Waran as practice.

Challenger isn't a terrible bomber, unless you're meeting up with Catamarans which everyone admits are bloody unfair.

[Image: DTdrqPU.gif]
Reply  
Offline Jinx
12-02-2008, 05:06 PM,
#3
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

its meant to be like that. it looks good, too. - its not a catamaran of course. - but that shouldn t be of any concern there.

but anyway - there are no plans to modify it.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline teschy
12-02-2008, 05:21 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-02-2008, 05:22 PM by teschy.)
#4
20yrs & I Only Got This Title
Posts: 2,471
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2007

What are you saying ? I've survived gunboat+cruiser+dozenpretorians attacks at the same time, in my challenger, it's a damn good ship. Best looking bomber out there.
Reply  
Offline Cosmos
12-02-2008, 05:40 PM,
#5
Member
Posts: 1,208
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2008

it might look good, but its slower at turning, and when anything hits it, even NPC MINES, the CM dropps off it like a twiglet andf so do other peices of equipment, any fix for that?

[Image: .png]
[22:50:33] ☆ҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳEternal†Nightmareҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳ☆(illi): i cyber with leather torps (smoking)
  Reply  
Offline Jinx
12-02-2008, 05:50 PM,
#6
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

well ... hm, no fix planned, i think. - the ship might be rebalaned in 4.85 - as many ships are. - but it won t get a new shape or very new characteristics.

mostly due to the fact that - i think you re hte first that slightly complained about it. - most players know that its a tank and no match for a catamaran ( which gets nerft of course ) - but i have only heard positive about the challenger.

components get a bit more hitpoints in 4.85 anyway ... but other than that, i cannot say much about it... i never used it , got no char that can fly it.

maybe some other ppl that actually used it in combat can say something about it, too.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Elvin
12-02-2008, 09:20 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 1,122
Threads: 50
Joined: Apr 2008

Well, It is slower than Catamaran, but a lot faster than some others. Try Civilian bomber or Waran, and they try to say again that Challanger is slow.

[Image: Siggy-1.png]
I buy things I don't want to make an impression on people I don't like.
  Reply  
Offline Rudo
12-02-2008, 09:26 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-02-2008, 09:29 PM by Rudo.)
#8
Member
Posts: 1,411
Threads: 55
Joined: Jul 2008

It's actually one of my favorite bombers, but I specialize in big slow ships with massive plants.

Collectors, Titans, the Waran, the Somtaaw SHF... the only thing I'm not a killing machine with is the Spatial which is ridiculous to try and fight fighters with. Still an awesome ship though, just needs to spent a bit more time at the drawing board.

The Spatial is without a doubt my favorite model in the game, though. I wish it were a Junker ship.


Anyways, back on topic: Jinx, you once said that you liked the BH Bomber best of all the Discovery ships, and that it best represented the continuation of a vanilla series of ships. I present the Challenger as a counterpoint to that argument.

[Image: DTdrqPU.gif]
Reply  
Offline MarvinCZ
12-03-2008, 02:21 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 1,312
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2008

Challenger is a beautiful bomber. Well, my first comment, when I saw it as a BAF recruit, was it is ugly. But I know better today.

Problem is I don't fly other bombers on the RP server. The CM on Challenger drops off very soon, but is it sooner than on other bombers? I didn't help much, did I ?
  Reply  
Offline cmfalconer
12-03-2008, 03:18 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 1,140
Threads: 52
Joined: Jun 2007

Not really. I fly a Taiidan, and the CM drops off of that if you fart in the wrong direction. it's paper-thin on that thing.

Challenger's good, if you like flying a tank. it's tough, but with a small lack of agility to compensate.

.
  Reply  
Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode