• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 379 380 381 382 383 … 547 Next »
Starflier mk II

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Starflier mk II
Offline Armageddon
07-22-2009, 10:35 PM,
#1
Member
Posts: 429
Threads: 46
Joined: Jul 2007

I have been thinking for the most mass produced ship in sirius to be left to rot at the bottom of the food chain would not make economic sense. As companies would begin to discard them and they would all eventually be left to rot in mothballs or sold for scrap.

Now to be honest wouldn't it be a lot cheaper to companies to upgrade the ships they already have available instead of just replacing them. I suggest that a mk II LF which is still relatively slightly weaker than the advanced Hawk be put into operation.

This makes sense from an RP perspective because you could see that with companies' losses mounting they would demand for thier starfliers to be upgraded.

Specs i was thinking.

Armour 2500
Armament 1x Class 8 2x class 7
Additional CM, CD, Mine
Cargo 35
Bots/bats 30

However it would retain most of its agility allowing it to still live upto its name. I don't know if this has been discussed already. It just really does seem strange to me why companies would 'chuck out' perfectly spaceworthy ships instead of upgrading.
  Reply  
Offline Montezuma/Kukulcan
07-22-2009, 10:38 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 1,691
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2009

Anyone who suggests changing the Starflier in ANY way shal be burnt as a heretic!

[Image: montezuma1.png]
  Reply  
Offline kindred
07-22-2009, 10:39 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-22-2009, 10:41 PM by kindred.)
#3
Member
Posts: 1,699
Threads: 9
Joined: Sep 2007

Starfliers are already being upgraded. refurbished and re branded as the Startracker for public sale.
On a equal production volume Starfliers and Startrackers are upgraded to Starblazers, a model very close to your proposal.




Devtonia ; all-or-nothing approach to bias.
Reply  
Offline Thexare
07-22-2009, 10:39 PM,
#4
Ominously Humming
Posts: 3,821
Threads: 340
Joined: Apr 2008

' Wrote:It just really does seem strange to me why companies would 'chuck out' perfectly spaceworthy ships instead of upgrading.
Think of the size of the Starflier. It probably just isn't big enough to support the necessary power supply and other things needed for heavier weaponry and shielding.

Also, none of the Star___ ships have disruptors...
Reply  
Offline Armageddon
07-22-2009, 10:40 PM,
#5
Member
Posts: 429
Threads: 46
Joined: Jul 2007

I was not suggesting Changing the starflier more making a second model such has done with the patriot ect.
  Reply  
Offline Montezuma/Kukulcan
07-22-2009, 10:41 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 1,691
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2009

' Wrote:I was not suggesting Changing the starflier more making a second model such has done with the patriot ect.


Startracker?

[Image: montezuma1.png]
  Reply  
Offline Armageddon
07-22-2009, 10:43 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 429
Threads: 46
Joined: Jul 2007

now seriously how is the startracker usable in this age class 4 weapons seriously.

The Blazer is not even usable if you want to fly solo. I don't know then maybe an addition to the starline at a even higher power rating.
  Reply  
Offline Montezuma/Kukulcan
07-22-2009, 10:52 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-22-2009, 10:54 PM by Montezuma/Kukulcan.)
#8
Member
Posts: 1,691
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2009

The idea is that as they progress in power, they get larger, culminating in the Eagle and Roc, so there is not much need for a flea mk 2.

If you are looking for a civillian Mk II LF, i suggest the Griffin.

[Image: montezuma1.png]
  Reply  
Offline Nightmouse
07-22-2009, 11:10 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 378
Threads: 3
Joined: Jul 2008

' Wrote:now seriously how is the startracker usable in this age class 4 weapons seriously.

The Blazer is not even usable if you want to fly solo. I don't know then maybe an addition to the starline at a even higher power rating.

I consider a Starblazer very useful, unless you believe a ship capable of deterring 2 Guardians is useless:)
  Reply  
Offline Armageddon
07-22-2009, 11:54 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 429
Threads: 46
Joined: Jul 2007

Okay consider this point moot.

But only thing i say now is you know the civillian freighter? Any chance of getting something matching the civvy shipline in as that?
  Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode