• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 259 260 261 262 263 … 547 Next »
Fighter guns

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Fighter guns
Offline Prysin
04-12-2011, 06:58 PM,
#1
Apex Predator
Posts: 3,098
Threads: 165
Joined: Jul 2009

Could we get some 1.0 refire fighter guns????

As this would allow guns to have high damage, range, speed and to some extent energy management whilst sacrifing their refire.

We have 1.0 transport guns, and i think, some 1.0 cap guns aswell, so why not for fighters? We should add some insanely epic 1.0 guns for CIVILLIANS... and make them PLASMA as non-factionalized plasma does not exist, and the factions who has plasma guns are so darn tight handed with them.

[Image: v1zVWKX.png]
DHC Discord
Reply  
Offline VoluptaBox
04-12-2011, 07:00 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,453
Threads: 68
Joined: Sep 2010


Just a few of those could shotgun a fighter istantly. I dunno, elaborate a bit on how you intend them balanced.
Reply  
Offline Taffic
04-12-2011, 07:11 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 407
Threads: 8
Joined: Sep 2007

' Wrote:Just a few of those could shotgun a fighter istantly. I dunno, elaborate a bit on how you intend them balanced.
Agreed - when I played on Void (all those years ago) Nomad Lasers were very popular & 2-3 blasts could kill.

[Image: trafalgartaffic.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Toaster
04-12-2011, 07:39 PM,
#4
Caution: Do NOT Insert Fingers
Posts: 3,136
Threads: 248
Joined: Sep 2010

What we really need are Civilian 2.0s, 3.03s, and 4.0s.

I so no reason for 1.0s, because those people who are good at aiming a Minirazor will utterly obliterate anything that stands in their path with those weapons, considering that they would have about 2000 Hull Damage.

[Image: NbE3ZJ9.png]
Olivia Sable
Reply  
Offline Prysin
04-12-2011, 08:49 PM,
#5
Apex Predator
Posts: 3,098
Threads: 165
Joined: Jul 2009

ya and? if we make the guns turn slower, aye? heavier guns, bigger gunmodels.... maybe add ridiculous energy drain instead? and high speed short range

EXAMPLE:

Hull Damage: 2075
Shield Damage: 1037
Rate of fire: 1.0
Speed: 950 m/s
Range: 500 m
Energy: 650

Then make the physical gun turn slower then normal guns, like maybe half the raction time as normal guns... so instead with fighter guns, the turning of these guns are more like a cruisers or battleships..

[Image: v1zVWKX.png]
DHC Discord
Reply  
Offline VoluptaBox
04-12-2011, 09:08 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 2,453
Threads: 68
Joined: Sep 2010


Fighter duels happen at very close range. With that speed...
Reply  
Offline Cond0r
04-12-2011, 09:33 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 2,499
Threads: 42
Joined: Sep 2009

' Wrote:EXAMPLE:

Hull Damage: 2075
Shield Damage: 1037
Rate of fire: 1.0
Speed: 950 m/s
Range: 500 m
Energy: 650
rofl

Didnt even bother reading the op after I saw this by accident.

[17:23:05] Mini Me: pls
[17:23:06] Mini Me: gtfo
  Reply  
Offline jakub963
04-12-2011, 09:42 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 796
Threads: 77
Joined: Oct 2009

Take Magma od Kiss stats... Buff it 5-10% but gief 1.0 refire... Shwing... Its civ, it sucks compared to house tech... Thats what everyone wants, correct? Its civ so it HAVE TO suck... Booyeah for disco logic...

[Image: 11244_s.gif]
  Reply  
Offline mjolnir
04-12-2011, 09:46 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 3,774
Threads: 71
Joined: Sep 2007

No


even if they do say "only" 1500 damage, then the insta-damage on 7 gun ships will be enough to instakill way too many things.

[Image: sigiw102.jpg]
Igiss says: Martin, you give them a finger, they bite off your arm.
Reply  
Offline Prysin
04-13-2011, 01:31 PM,
#10
Apex Predator
Posts: 3,098
Threads: 165
Joined: Jul 2009

' Wrote:No
even if they do say "only" 1500 damage, then the insta-damage on 7 gun ships will be enough to instakill way too many things.


Poor reason for not implimenting.

So you mean, 11 Transport Type 2 on shire is ok. Cuz those 36k's worth of damage has no chance instakilling?

Ok.

[Image: v1zVWKX.png]
DHC Discord
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode