BAF Faction Status

[mwerte]

will the BAF keep the current semi-neutral stance toward the Outcasts? Will you guys keep using Infernos on your fighters?

---

[Dab]

I'll be teh catch u >.>

blasted yacht ....

The day you finally catch and stop me successfully and force me to surrender, I'll hand you 20 million credits.. Provided the bribe gets me off the hook of course.;)

and I can only speak about that IMG matter for my self here.

Back when I was trying to create an IMG player faction I went to CR and whined big time about their screwed foreign politics that made our business hell in bretonia (after all, we have two bases in bretonia). So they negotiated a peace treaty with UoG and neutrality with the queen.
From that day on, IMG was always tolerated and aided against common foes (at least my IMG chars were).

CR is treated with suspicion and escorted in bretonian space to make sure they leave. it always feels good to see them taking the o-3 / t-31 gate ...

Alright, looks like I'll have to go through diplomatic channels to get my permission.. Persuasion time.. After I'm home and out of Computer Programming class, which is really just about 30% work, 70% do whatever I want..

---

[Cawdor]

will the BAF keep the current semi-neutral stance toward the Outcasts? Will you guys keep using Infernos on your fighters?

We will NOT use OC equipment (the fighter-inferno in your case). Neutrality currently under discussion.

The day you finally catch and stop me successfully and force me to surrender, I'll hand you 20 million credits.. Provided the bribe gets me off the hook of course.;)

yer, your gunnery officer wont get away that easy though. there is still an "accident" to investigate.

>.>

<.<

---

.

.

[Dieter Schprokets]

will the BAF keep the current semi-neutral stance toward the Outcasts? Will you guys keep using Infernos on your fighters?

Yes

Likely not

---

[Dieter Schprokets]

Von Gotteshand's answers to the questions make sense, and I'll be revising the status to reflect that.

As will Trevelyan's and other comments.

Hard to fit in in next couple of days.

---

[MarvinCZ]

oops, I missed this thread...

Promotions are appreciated, thanks:)
I think it's fine (with the details pointed out already). The Pirate ID and BAF tag of the Privateers should be mentioned in faction status.

[Capt. Henry Morgan]

Under Support and Supplies, you mentioned that Bowex was formed in 310. The infocard for Glasgow Outpost does say that they recieved their Royal Charter in that year, but one of the rumors reads as follows:

We have been serving Sirius since 66 AS. That makes us one of the oldest surviving companies in Bretonia. We didn't get this far by being easy on our competitors and enemies. That irritating upstart, Gateway, will fail soon enough. Our influential friends in London will make sure of that.

That suggests to me that Bowex was already quite old when they got their charter. Perhaps the 310 date refers to them receiving exclusive government supply rights, rather than the year they formed?

---

Natio Octavarium
Faction Information and Status • Recruitment
Faction Feedback • Internal Affairs

[Cawdor]

new ZoI

---

.

.

[Dieter Schprokets]

Updated, incorporated most comments, revising now...

My siggy is too big now..

---

[Dieter Schprokets]

Also, the Privateers should have an "equivalent" rank when dealing with non-privateers?

Like the British SAS are all Sergaent.

Lt Commander?

Or is this necessary?

Blunt?

---