' Wrote:I support this idea...
But guys... You can't just forget the properly role-played caps.
' Wrote:Need I repeat this will also stop the innocent caps?
' Wrote:Now, there's no way you can tell me that the Navy is giving command of gigantic capital ships bristling with enemy weaponry to retarded captains with various speech disorders in atime of war. That's just stupid.
Now, so this isn't just another rant about the issue, I propose that ownership of a Capital-class vessel (excluding Gunboats) should require membership in a Faction and the required rank, or otherwise permission from the faction.
It wont, the idea is to keep them available for the good players, they just have to prove their abilities before and request it.
' Wrote:EVERY BODY HAS A BREAKING POINT me and sarawr here have reached ours thereim blunt
I'd say count me in there, I'll continue helping really new players who just happened to come here to try the server before caring about the forums and stuff. But those who decided to stay here for a while ... enough sweet temper, guns and reports.
' Wrote:Go play the game, within the given limitations. That is how role play games are played. Not by trying to work around those limitations or whining about them.
But seems no-one cares. I rememeber now Jinx post about balance being not only in stats. And look here. The thing Jinx said about it is totaly forgatten here.
I know you all want pretty powerfull bs's the problem is that people who do not deservet hem overhelms all good people and often makes more problems than goodpeople makes fun.
Restrict them first, boost tehm later. Im tired. Really. "Oh of coruse we will restrict them" -NO, DO IT NOW, and then boost. If you cant restrict them do not boost at all. Besides if those ships for someone are more for rp ant fighting you can live with weaker ship.
And if it is more bs's than fighters in the mod, that means bs's should be weak. And it's not only about stats.
![[Image: signaturr.gif]](http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/9549/signaturr.gif)
